首页> 外文OA文献 >Arts practices in unreasonable doubt? Reflections on understandings of arts practices in healthcare contexts
【2h】

Arts practices in unreasonable doubt? Reflections on understandings of arts practices in healthcare contexts

机译:艺术实践中是否存在不合理的疑问?关于对医疗领域艺术实践的理解的思考

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article suggests that the discourse on arts and health encompass contemporary arts practices as an active and engaged analytical activity. Distinctions between arts therapy and arts practice are made to suggest that clinical evidence-based evaluation, while appropriate for arts therapy, is not appropriate for arts practice and in effect cast them in unreasonable doubt. Themes in current discourse on “arts” and “health” are broadly sketched to provide a context for discussion of arts practices. Approaches to knowledge validation in relation to each domain are discussed. These discourses are applied to the Irish healthcare context, offering a reading of three different art projects; it suggests a multiplicity of analyses beyond causal positive health gains. It is suggested that the social turn in medicine and the social turn in arts practices share some similar pre-occupations that warrant further attention.
机译:本文认为,关于艺术与健康的论述涵盖了当代艺术实践,将其作为一种积极而活跃的分析活动。艺术治疗与艺术实践之间的区别表明,基于临床证据的评估虽然适用于艺术治疗,但不适用于艺术实践,因此实际上给他们带来了不合理的怀疑。当前关于“艺术”和“健康”的论述中的主题被粗略地勾勒出来,以提供讨论艺术实践的背景。讨论了与每个领域有关的知识验证方法。这些论述适用于爱尔兰的医疗保健领域,提供了对三个不同艺术项目的阅读;它表明除了因果关系带来的积极健康收益外,还需要进行多种分析。有人建议医学界的转变和艺术实践界的转变有一些相似的前提,值得进一步关注。

著录项

  • 作者

    Broderick, Sheelagh;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号